Open Source RadarNotícias G
Open Source RadarNotícias
Open Source RadarInteligência de Notícias Entrar Projetos
Todos os eventos
Pesquisa Pesquisa Médio prazo 1 matérias

Where Do Vision-Language Models Get Left and Right? Position-Code Counterfactuals in Qwen2.5-VL, Qwen3-VL and InternVL3

A vision-language model may take left-right direction from the orientation of image content within patches, its vision transformer's (ViT) position code, or token positions and order in its language model (LLM). Ablations show the ViT code is necessary; we test sufficiency by mirroring only a position code. In Qwen2.5-VL-7B, Qwen3-VL-4B and InternVL3-2B, mirroring ViT width positions reproduces the flipped-image answer on 84.3-93.2% of CV-Bench left-right questions (Qwen2.5-VL-3B: 87.5%, partly a left fallback). With two options, this also counts disruption; a half-grid shift flips most answers too. With the ViT code intact, LLM-side id and token-order mirrors change few left-right answers in all three series (a weak id test in Qwen2.5-VL). In Qwen2.5-VL-7B the effect sits in the global-attention ViT blocks, mostly the last. On What'sUp, flipping content and token order, not the positio…

Evento consolidado
Gerenciar alertas
Análise do Radar

O que aconteceu e por que importa

Inteligência do evento

Por que este sinal merece atenção

Comparar com Em Alta
85Relevânciaforça do sinal no contexto atual
38Tendênciavelocidade e recorrência do movimento
100Novidadequanto o sinal adiciona informação nova
Não identificadoImpacto Brasilabrir contexto nacional
Primeiro sinal10/11/2026 13:25
Último sinal10/11/2026 13:25
0horas em evolução
1fontes distintas
Evidências

Timeline do evento

1 matéria(s)
10/11 13:25
arXiv cs.LGGlobal
Where Do Vision-Language Models Get Left and Right? Position-Code Counterfactuals in Qwen2.5-VL, Qwen3-VL and InternVL3
A vision-language model may take left-right direction from the orientation of image content within patches, its vision transformer's (ViT) position code, or token positions and order in its language model (LLM). Ablations show the ViT code is necessary; we test sufficiency by mirroring only a position code. In Qwen2.5-VL-7B, Qwen3-VL-4B and InternVL3-2B, mirroring ViT width positions reproduces the flipped-image answer on 84.3-93.2% of CV-Bench left-right questions (Qwen2.5-VL-3B: 87.5%, partly a left fallback). With two options, this also counts disruption; a half-grid shift flips most answers too. With the ViT code intact, LLM-side id and token-order mirrors change few left-right answers in all three series (a weak id test in Qwen2.5-VL). In Qwen2.5-VL-7B the effect sits in the global-attention ViT blocks, mostly the last. On What'sUp, flipping content and token order, not the positio…
Abrir fonte original
Receba o Radar Diário grátis
Todo dia às 8h: as notícias e os projetos open source de IA que importam, com contexto em português e a análise completa em PDF.
Prefere começar pelo PDF de hoje? Baixe o panorama.